Contents
Syllogism is one of the most important topics in the logical reasoning section of the Civil Service Exam. Many examinees find syllogism challenging not because it is mathematically complex, but because it demands precision in logic, careful reading, and disciplined thinking. A small assumption or misinterpretation can easily lead to a wrong answer.
In the Civil Service Exam, syllogism questions test your ability to draw valid conclusions from given statements using formal logic. These questions are designed to measure analytical thinking, attention to detail, and consistency in reasoning—skills that are essential for public service roles.
This guide provides a complete, structured, and exam-focused explanation of syllogism, helping you master concepts, avoid common traps, and answer questions accurately under time pressure.
A syllogism is a form of deductive reasoning where a conclusion is derived from two or more given statements (also called premises). The conclusion must follow logically and necessarily from the premises, without adding assumptions or outside knowledge.
A basic syllogism consists of:
Major premise
Minor premise
Conclusion
All teachers are educated.
Some educated people are researchers.
Conclusion: Some teachers are researchers.
In exam logic, you must check whether the conclusion must be true, not whether it sounds reasonable.
Syllogism questions are frequently included because they:
Test pure logical ability without relying on memorization
Are time-efficient if mastered
Help differentiate between careful thinkers and guess-based answers
Reflect real-world decision-making logic
In many Civil Service Exams, syllogism questions appear as direct conclusion-based problems, making them scoring opportunities for well-prepared candidates.
These questions present two or three statements followed by multiple conclusions. You must identify which conclusions logically follow.
Example:
All cats are animals.
Some animals are pets.
Possible conclusions:
Some cats are pets.
All pets are cats.
Only conclusions that are 100% logically valid should be selected.
These involve words such as:
All
Some
No
Some…not
Understanding these quantifiers is essential because logical meaning differs from everyday usage.
For example:
“Some” means at least one, possibly more.
“Some not” means at least one does not belong.
Negative statements include words like:
No
None
Not
Example:
No doctors are lazy.
Some lazy people are students.
This structure often confuses candidates, but careful diagramming helps clarify valid conclusions.
Never assume information that is not explicitly stated. Logical reasoning in exams is strict and literal.
Incorrect thinking:
“Teachers are usually educated, so…”
Correct thinking:
Only what is stated matters.
In syllogism:
“Some” = at least one
It does NOT mean some but not all
Therefore, conclusions that assume “some but not all” are usually invalid unless clearly stated.
If both premises are negative, no valid conclusion can be drawn.
Example:
No A is B.
No B is C.
No definite relationship between A and C can be concluded.
“All” statements do not confirm that the subject actually exists.
Example:
All unicorns are animals.
This does not mean unicorns exist.
A conclusion using “some” must be supported by at least one premise using “some”.
Venn diagrams visually represent logical relationships using overlapping circles. They are especially useful for beginners.
Steps:
Draw circles for each category
Shade or mark areas based on “all” and “no” statements
Place “X” for “some”
Check whether a conclusion is already proven by the diagram
Clear visual logic
Reduces confusion
Best for beginners
Time-consuming in the exam
Difficult with multiple conclusions
Advanced candidates often use analytical reasoning without drawing diagrams.
Key ideas:
Track relationships mentally
Focus on certainty, not possibility
Eliminate conclusions that introduce new information
This method is faster once mastered and ideal for time-pressured exams.
Some exams introduce advanced phrasing such as:
Only A are B
Only a few A are B
“Only A are B” means: All B are A
“Only a few A are B” means:
Some A are B
Some A are not B
Misinterpreting these phrases is a common reason for errors.
Exams require conclusions that must follow, not those that may follow.
If a conclusion is merely possible, it is considered invalid.
“All A are B” does NOT mean “All B are A”.
This error frequently appears in incorrect options.
Your personal knowledge must be ignored.
Example:
“All politicians are honest.”
Even if unrealistic, you must accept it as true for the question.
Read statements carefully
Identify universal vs particular statements
Eliminate conclusions that introduce new terms
Reject conclusions based on assumptions
Check certainty, not likelihood
Use elimination method if unsure
Practicing this sequence consistently improves speed and accuracy.
Do not overthink simple statements
Skip diagram drawing if confident
Answer direct conclusions first
Return to complex cases later
With practice, syllogism questions can be solved in under 30 seconds each.
The examiner checks whether:
The conclusion is logically inevitable
The conclusion follows from given premises only
No outside information is used
Even a conclusion that feels “obviously true” is rejected if it is not logically guaranteed.
Syllogism is not about intelligence—it is about discipline and repetition.
Recommended practice approach:
Start with Venn diagrams
Move to analytical reasoning
Practice mixed difficulty sets
Review wrong answers carefully
Consistent exposure trains your mind to detect logical patterns automatically.
In higher-level exams, syllogism may be combined with:
Statements and assumptions
Statements and conclusions
Logical consistency checks
A strong foundation in basic syllogism significantly improves performance in these advanced topics.
Syllogism is one of the highest-return topics in the Civil Service Exam. Once mastered, it becomes predictable, fast, and reliable. Unlike calculation-heavy topics, syllogism rewards clarity of thought rather than speed or memory.
By understanding core rules, avoiding assumptions, and practicing systematically, you can turn syllogism into a consistent scoring area.
Master the logic, trust the rules, and let reasoning—not intuition—guide your answers.
Read the statements carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow.
Q1
Statements:
All managers are leaders.
Some leaders are trainers.
Conclusions:
I. Some managers are trainers.
II. All trainers are leaders.
Q2
Statements:
No cars are bicycles.
Some vehicles are cars.
Conclusions:
I. Some vehicles are not bicycles.
II. Some bicycles are vehicles.
Q3
Statements:
All books are papers.
All papers are recyclable.
Conclusions:
I. All books are recyclable.
II. Some recyclable items are books.
Q1: Neither I nor II follows
Q2: Only I follows
Q3: Both I and II follow
Choose the correct conclusion(s) that logically follow.
Q4
Statements:
All roses are flowers.
Some flowers are red.
Conclusions:
I. Some roses are red.
II. All red things are flowers.
Q5
Statements:
Some students are athletes.
All athletes are disciplined.
Conclusions:
I. Some students are disciplined.
II. All disciplined people are students.
Q6
Statements:
No dogs are cats.
All cats are animals.
Conclusions:
I. No dogs are animals.
II. Some animals are cats.
Q4: Neither I nor II follows
Q5: Only I follows
Q6: Only II follows
Decide whether the first statement is the cause, the effect, both are effects of a common cause, or they are unrelated.
Q7
Statement I: Heavy rainfall occurred in the city.
Statement II: Several roads were flooded.
Q8
Statement I: The company reduced employee salaries.
Statement II: Employee morale declined.
Q9
Statement I: The alarm system malfunctioned.
Statement II: The security guard was absent.
Q7: Statement I is the cause, Statement II is the effect
Q8: Statement I is the cause, Statement II is the effect
Q9: Statements are unrelated
Choose which course of action logically follows the given situation.
Q10
A city is facing frequent traffic accidents at a busy intersection.
Courses of Action:
I. Install traffic signals at the intersection.
II. Ban all vehicles from using the intersection.
Q11
There is a sudden increase in waterborne diseases in a town.
Courses of Action:
I. Inspect and clean public water sources.
II. Shut down all restaurants permanently.
Q10: Only I follows
Q11: Only I follows
Choose the statement that can be logically inferred.
Q12
Statement:
Most employees in the office arrive before 9 a.m.
Inferences:
I. Some employees arrive after 9 a.m.
II. All employees arrive before 9 a.m.
Q13
Statement:
Only trained candidates were selected.
Inferences:
I. Some trained candidates were selected.
II. No untrained candidate was selected.
Q12: Only I follows
Q13: Both I and II follow
Identify the assumption implicit in the statement.
Q14
Statement:
The government should increase fuel prices to reduce pollution.
Assumptions:
I. Increasing fuel prices will reduce fuel consumption.
II. Pollution is mainly caused by fuel usage.
Q15
Statement:
He must be honest because he returned the lost wallet.
Assumptions:
I. Honest people return lost items.
II. Everyone who returns a wallet is honest.
Q14: Both I and II are assumed
Q15: Only I is assumed
Answer the questions based on the given information.
Q16
Five people A, B, C, D, and E are sitting in a row.
Rules:
A is not at either end
B sits to the immediate right of C
D is at the left end
Who is sitting in the middle?
Q16: A
Always rely only on given information
Avoid real-world logic unless stated
Be cautious with words like all, some, none, only
Practice timed sets to improve speed
Accuracy matters more than speed in Logical Deduction
Civil Service Exam Philippines: Complete Preparation and Passing Guide