 
                                        
                    
                    
                    
Contents
When preparing for the IELTS Writing Task 2, one of the less common but increasingly important essay types you may encounter is the double question essay. Unlike opinion, discussion, or problem-solution essays, the double question essay requires candidates to respond to two distinct questions in a single task. Many test-takers find this challenging because it requires clear organization, balanced treatment of both questions, and effective time management.
This guide provides a comprehensive look at the structure, strategies, and tips for writing a strong double question essay that can help you achieve a Band 7 or higher.
A double question essay, sometimes called a “direct question essay,” presents you with two separate but related questions on a given topic. These questions are often open-ended and require you to analyze, explain, or provide examples.
For example:
Some people think that children should learn how to manage money in school. Others believe that this is the responsibility of parents. What are the benefits of teaching children money management at school? How else can children learn about money?
Notice how this task contains two clear questions:
What are the benefits of teaching money management at school?
How else can children learn about money?
Your essay must address both questions fully to meet the task response criterion.
Two direct questions: These are usually related to a common theme.
Balanced answers required: Both questions need thorough coverage. Ignoring one question results in a lower band score.
Flexibility in structure: You can answer each question in a separate paragraph or combine them if the ideas overlap.
A simple and effective structure is as follows:
Paraphrase the question.
State that you will answer both questions.
Topic sentence directly addressing the first question.
Explanation, details, and examples.
Topic sentence directly addressing the second question.
Explanation, details, and examples.
Summarize answers to both questions.
Provide a final thought or implication.
Spend 2–3 minutes underlining the two questions. Identify the keywords to ensure your answer stays focused.
Quickly generate points for each question. Aim for two strong ideas per question with supporting details.
Decide whether to dedicate one paragraph per question or to combine them. The one-paragraph-per-question method is usually clearer and safer.
Stay concise and academic. Avoid going off-topic.
In the final 2–3 minutes, review grammar, vocabulary, and ensure both questions are fully answered.
Question:
Many people nowadays prefer to communicate through online messaging rather than face-to-face. What are the advantages of this trend? Are there any disadvantages?
Model Essay:
In recent years, online messaging has become the dominant form of communication. This trend brings several advantages, but it also poses certain drawbacks.
One clear advantage of online messaging is convenience. People can send messages instantly regardless of distance or time zones, which is particularly useful in both personal and professional contexts. For example, international businesses can coordinate with partners across the globe without the need for expensive phone calls or travel. Additionally, messaging applications often allow users to share images, documents, and videos, which makes communication more effective and versatile.
Despite these benefits, online messaging also has disadvantages. A major concern is the lack of personal connection. Unlike face-to-face interactions, messages do not convey tone of voice or body language, which can lead to misunderstandings. Moreover, excessive reliance on online communication may reduce opportunities for developing strong interpersonal skills, particularly among young people. For instance, teenagers who spend most of their time chatting online may struggle with real-life conversations and social confidence.
In conclusion, while online messaging provides great convenience and efficiency, it also reduces the quality of personal interactions. Therefore, people should take advantage of digital tools but also make time for face-to-face communication to maintain healthy social relationships.
Address both questions equally – Do not write a long essay on one and a short answer on the other. Balance is key.
Stay on topic – Ensure each paragraph answers the exact question. Avoid drifting into unrelated ideas.
Use linking devices – Words like firstly, moreover, however, in contrast, on the other hand help organize ideas clearly.
Be mindful of word count – Aim for 270–300 words. Writing significantly less can reduce your score.
Practice paraphrasing – The introduction should not repeat the task verbatim. Practice rephrasing questions into academic English.
Avoid overcomplicating – You do not need complex arguments. Simple, well-developed points with examples are enough.
Time management – Spend about 40 minutes on Task 2, allocating 5 minutes for planning, 30 for writing, and 5 for reviewing.
Ignoring one question: This is the biggest mistake and results in a Band 5 or 6.
Writing an opinion essay instead: Some candidates only present their view instead of answering the two questions directly.
Too many ideas: Stick to two strong points per question. Extra ideas may weaken development.
Poor organization: Mixing both answers in one long paragraph without clear structure confuses examiners.
Colloquial language: Avoid casual expressions. Use formal academic English.
Advantages/Benefits: convenience, efficiency, accessibility, cost-effectiveness, global reach
Disadvantages/Drawbacks: dependency, isolation, miscommunication, lack of personal interaction, reduced skills
Explaining: this means that, as a result, therefore, consequently
Examples: for example, for instance, such as, namely
Some people believe that reading books is more beneficial for children than watching television. What are the advantages of reading for children? How can reading habits be encouraged?
In many countries, fast food has become a part of daily life. What are the reasons for its popularity? What problems does it cause?
The use of cars is increasing rapidly. What are the reasons behind this trend? How can governments encourage people to use public transport?
The double question essay in IELTS Writing Task 2 requires clear organization, balanced answers, and academic style. With proper preparation and practice, you can master this essay type and use it to showcase your ability to generate ideas, explain them, and write fluently under exam conditions. Always remember: answer both questions fully, stay relevant, and support your points with explanations and examples.
By following this structured approach, you can confidently aim for a Band 7 or higher in your IELTS Writing exam.
A Double Question (also called a Direct Question) essay presents a single topic followed by two separate questions you must address fully. Unlike an Opinion or Discussion essay, you are not primarily evaluating opposing views; instead, you are expected to produce direct, well-supported answers to both questions. Typical prompts ask about causes and solutions, advantages and disadvantages, benefits and methods, or reasons and consequences. Failing to answer one of the two questions will significantly lower your Task Response score.
A clear, safe structure is:
Keep one paragraph per question to maintain clarity. Avoid mixing answers unless there is strong overlap and you can signpost clearly.
Paraphrase the task statement using synonyms and changed sentence structure, then include a roadmap sentence that signals you will address both questions. Keep it 2–3 sentences. Avoid adding new arguments or examples in the introduction. Aim for precise framing rather than detail. You do not need a strong personal opinion unless the prompt requests one; focus on directly addressing the questions.
Each body paragraph should open with a topic sentence that explicitly answers the relevant question. For example: “The main advantages of remote work are flexibility and time efficiency.” Then develop each advantage with explanation and a brief example. Clear topic sentences guide the examiner and improve Coherence and Cohesion.
Two well-developed ideas per question is optimal for a 250–300 word essay. More ideas can dilute development and produce shallow explanations. For each idea, add a short explanation and a concrete example (personal, hypothetical, or evidence-based). Depth beats breadth in IELTS; development quality matters more than the number of points.
Allocate roughly equal space to each answer. If one question is easier, resist the urge to overdevelop it at the expense of the other. During planning, list two ideas for each question and aim for similar sentence counts. In your conclusion, summarize answers to both questions, which reinforces balance and strengthens Task Response.
Spend ~40 minutes on Task 2. Suggested breakdown:
Good planning prevents going off-topic and reduces revision time.
Use logical connectors to clarify relationships:
Also use signposts specific to the task: “Regarding the first question…” and “As for the second question…” This makes your structure transparent.
Favor formal, precise language and avoid slang or contractions. Choose topic-appropriate lexis (e.g., cost-effectiveness, skill acquisition, public health) and maintain grammatical accuracy. Vary sentence structures: mix simple, compound, and complex sentences. Use nominalization sparingly to avoid wordiness. Aim for clarity and concision rather than ornate phrasing.
Use quick frameworks to spark content. For advantages/benefits, think in terms of cost, time, access, quality, equity, sustainability. For reasons/causes, consider technology, economics, policy, culture, education, infrastructure. For solutions/methods, map to government, schools, employers, families, individuals. Choose two angles with the strongest examples and keep them practical.
Data is not required. If you use figures, keep them plausible and secondary to explanation. IELTS rewards clear reasoning and relevant examples more than hard data. A short, realistic example—“a school integrating budgeting apps in a life-skills course”—often earns more credit than an unverifiable statistic.
The minimum is 250 words. A strong Double Question essay typically lands between 270 and 320 words. Longer essays are not inherently better; they often introduce undeveloped ideas or errors. Prioritize precise development and accuracy over length.
Write 1–3 sentences that synthesize, not repeat verbatim. Explicitly restate concise answers to both questions and, optionally, add a forward-looking remark. Avoid new ideas or examples. The conclusion should confirm that you addressed the task fully and leave a coherent final impression.
Use linking devices selectively and meaningfully. Overusing connectors can feel formulaic. Prioritize logical paragraphing, clear topic sentences, and consistent pronoun referencing. Maintain a steady progression: statement → explanation → example → mini-conclusion. This internal logic is more impactful than a long list of connectors.
Accuracy in verb tenses, subject–verb agreement, articles, and prepositions is critical. Demonstrate range through complex sentences, relative clauses, and concessive structures (e.g., “While online courses improve access, they can reduce peer interaction.”). Keep punctuation clean—especially commas in complex sentences. Do not sacrifice clarity for complexity.
Pick brief, concrete scenarios that directly illustrate your point: a classroom policy, a workplace practice, or a community initiative. Personal or hypothetical examples are acceptable if they are plausible and relevant. One or two sentences per example is enough; avoid storytelling. Anchor examples to the topic sentence so the link is unmistakable.
For advantages/benefits: efficiency, accessibility, affordability, scalability, equity. For disadvantages/risks: dependency, erosion of skills, inequity, unintended consequences. For methods/solutions: incentivize, implement, facilitate, integrate, regulate. For analysis: underlying, mitigate, precipitate, reinforce, trade-off. Use collocations naturally (e.g., “implement targeted subsidies,” “reinforce best practices”).
Identify core terms that must remain accurate (e.g., “financial literacy” vs. “money skills”). Paraphrase around them by altering structure, switching parts of speech, and using near-synonyms only where the meaning stays intact. After paraphrasing, quickly re-check the prompt to confirm nothing essential was distorted.
Use this 60-second grid on your question paper:
This mini-plan keeps development balanced and prevents repetition or drift.
Examiners use four equally weighted criteria: Task Response (both questions fully answered with relevant, developed ideas), Coherence and Cohesion (logical organization and accurate referencing), Lexical Resource (range and precision of vocabulary), and Grammatical Range and Accuracy (varied structures with few errors). A weakness in Task Response—especially ignoring one question—can cap your overall band.
It is possible but risky; you must signpost clearly and keep the line of argument easy to follow. For most candidates, separate paragraphs are safer and typically clearer. If you combine, ensure balanced development and explicit markers such as “Regarding the first question…” and “Turning to the second…”.
Confirm that each body paragraph directly addresses one question, topic sentences are explicit, examples are relevant, and the conclusion summarizes both answers. Fix any repeated words, agreement errors, and missing articles. If time is short, prioritize corrections to topic sentences and grammar in the first and last sentences of each paragraph—they shape the examiner’s perception.