 
                                        
                    
                    
                    
Contents
The IELTS Writing Task 2 is often considered the most challenging section of the IELTS exam. Candidates are required to produce a clear, coherent, and well-structured essay of at least 250 words within 40 minutes. What makes this task particularly demanding is not only the time pressure but also the need to demonstrate a wide range of vocabulary, strong grammar control, critical thinking, and logical organization of ideas.
In this guide, we will explore the main essay types in IELTS Writing Task 2, highlight their specific requirements, and provide high-band strategies that can help you achieve a band score of 7.0, 8.0, or even 9.0. The total length of this article is over 1000 words, giving you an in-depth overview of what it takes to excel.
In IELTS Writing Task 2, you are presented with a prompt that asks for your opinion or analysis of a social, environmental, educational, or global issue. You must write an essay that directly addresses the question. The examiner will assess your response using four criteria:
Task Response (25%) – How well you answer the question, present clear ideas, and support them with examples.
Coherence and Cohesion (25%) – How logically you organize your essay, including paragraphing, linking words, and transitions.
Lexical Resource (25%) – Your range and accuracy of vocabulary, including topic-related words and collocations.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy (25%) – Your ability to use varied grammar structures without too many errors.
Understanding these criteria is the foundation for approaching each essay type effectively.
Although IELTS prompts can vary widely, most fall into one of the following categories:
Opinion Essays (Agree or Disagree)
Discussion Essays (Discuss Both Views)
Problem-Solution Essays
Advantages-Disadvantages Essays
Double Question Essays
Let’s break down each type and examine high-band strategies.
Example prompt:
Some people believe that technology has made our lives more complicated, while others think it has made life easier. Do you agree or disagree?
How to approach:
Decide whether you strongly agree, strongly disagree, or partially agree.
Present your stance clearly in the introduction and restate it in the conclusion.
Support your opinion with two or three strong arguments and relevant examples.
High-band strategy:
Avoid sitting “on the fence” unless the question allows a balanced view. If you choose partial agreement, make sure your thesis is clear (e.g., “While technology has created certain complications, I believe its benefits far outweigh its drawbacks”).
Use cause-and-effect structures to strengthen arguments.
Incorporate academic or real-life examples (e.g., how smartphones improve communication but increase stress levels).
Structure for Band 8+:
Introduction with clear thesis
Body Paragraph 1: Strong argument supporting your opinion
Body Paragraph 2: Second argument with example
(Optional Body Paragraph 3: Counterargument and rebuttal)
Conclusion: Restate thesis
Example prompt:
Some people think children should start school as early as possible, while others believe they should begin later. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
How to approach:
Present both sides objectively before giving your own stance.
Use linking phrases like On the one hand… On the other hand…
End the essay with a clear personal opinion.
High-band strategy:
Balance is key: devote roughly equal space to both views.
Show critical thinking by not just describing opinions, but evaluating their strengths and weaknesses.
In your conclusion, make sure your opinion is consistent with the arguments you presented.
Structure for Band 8+:
Introduction (paraphrase + thesis that indicates you will discuss both sides and give your opinion)
Body Paragraph 1: First view with explanation and example
Body Paragraph 2: Second view with explanation and example
Body Paragraph 3: Your opinion (if not already integrated)
Conclusion: Summarize and restate opinion
Example prompt:
In many cities around the world, traffic congestion is becoming a serious problem. What are the causes of this issue, and what measures can be taken to solve it?
How to approach:
Identify two or three key problems and explain why they are significant.
Propose practical solutions, showing how they can address the problems.
High-band strategy:
Make sure your solutions are realistic and directly linked to the problems.
Avoid vague solutions like “the government should do something.” Instead, specify policies (e.g., investment in public transport, congestion charges, remote working initiatives).
Use conditional structures (If governments invest in rail systems, commuting will become more efficient).
Structure for Band 8+:
Introduction (problem + thesis)
Body Paragraph 1: Causes of the problem
Body Paragraph 2: Solutions with examples
Conclusion: Summarize and stress importance of action
Example prompt:
Some people choose to work from home. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?
How to approach:
Present both benefits and drawbacks clearly.
Decide whether you need to give an opinion (depends on the wording of the question).
High-band strategy:
Organize logically: advantages in one paragraph, disadvantages in another.
Avoid imbalance: if you list three advantages and one disadvantage, the essay looks weak. Try to provide at least two for each side.
Use comparative structures (While remote work saves commuting time, it may also reduce social interaction).
Structure for Band 8+:
Introduction (mention both advantages and disadvantages)
Body Paragraph 1: Advantages with examples
Body Paragraph 2: Disadvantages with examples
Conclusion: Summarize, and if required, give your opinion on which side is stronger
Example prompt:
Many people today prefer to shop online rather than in stores. Why is this the case? Is this a positive or negative development?
How to approach:
Answer both questions fully.
Usually requires one paragraph for the first question (causes/reasons) and one for the second (your evaluation).
High-band strategy:
Do not ignore one of the questions; this is a common mistake.
Use clear topic sentences to show which question you are addressing.
Provide a balanced view if appropriate, but end with a clear stance.
Structure for Band 8+:
Introduction (paraphrase + thesis outlining both answers)
Body Paragraph 1: Answer to the first question (why people shop online)
Body Paragraph 2: Answer to the second question (positive/negative)
Conclusion: Summarize and restate stance
Regardless of essay type, the following strategies are crucial for scoring Band 7.0 and above:
Spend 3–5 minutes brainstorming ideas and outlining structure.
Identify key arguments and examples to avoid repeating or drifting off-topic.
Paraphrase the question using synonyms and varied sentence structures.
State your thesis clearly so the examiner knows your position immediately.
Use a wide range of linking devices: however, therefore, in addition, on the other hand, as a result, whereas.
Avoid overusing basic connectors like and, but, so.
Each paragraph should have one main idea.
Support with explanations, examples, and evidence.
Avoid listing too many points without development.
Replace informal words with formal equivalents (kids → children, lots of → a significant number of).
Use topic-specific vocabulary relevant to the question (e.g., carbon emissions, digital divide, healthcare system).
Use a range of sentence structures: complex, compound, conditional, passive voice, relative clauses.
Minimize mistakes in subject-verb agreement, tenses, and articles.
Allocate 5 minutes for planning, 30 minutes for writing, and 5 minutes for checking grammar and spelling.
Summarize main points without repeating exact phrases from the introduction.
Reinforce your opinion with confident language (Therefore, it is clear that…).
Misunderstanding the task – Always check whether the essay requires an opinion, discussion, or both.
Too informal style – Avoid slang, contractions (don’t, can’t), or personal anecdotes unless highly relevant.
Overcomplicated sentences – Aim for clarity. Long sentences with errors reduce your score.
Not answering all parts – Double questions especially require complete responses.
Poor paragraphing – An essay without clear paragraphs loses marks for coherence.
Practice under exam conditions: write essays in 40 minutes.
Read sample high-band essays to learn advanced vocabulary and logical flow.
Focus on quality over quantity: 270–320 words is ideal; don’t write excessively long essays without structure.
Always proofread: catching one or two grammar mistakes can raise your score.
IELTS Writing Task 2 is not just about language ability; it also tests critical thinking, organization, and the ability to construct persuasive arguments. By understanding the five main essay types—opinion, discussion, problem-solution, advantages-disadvantages, and double-question—you can tailor your approach to any prompt. Combined with high-band strategies such as strong introductions, cohesive devices, advanced vocabulary, and error-free grammar, you can significantly improve your chances of achieving a Band 7.0, 8.0, or even 9.0.
With consistent practice, careful planning, and a focus on clarity, you will be well-prepared to tackle any IELTS Writing Task 2 essay with confidence.
IELTS Writing Task 2 is an academic-style essay that asks you to respond to a question about a social, educational, environmental, or global issue. You must write at least 250 words. Most high-scoring responses fall between 270 and 320 words because this range offers enough space to develop ideas while leaving time to check grammar and coherence. The total time available is 40 minutes, so effective planning and a brief final review are essential.
The common types are: (1) Opinion (Agree/Disagree), (2) Discussion (Discuss both views and give your opinion), (3) Problem–Solution, (4) Advantages–Disadvantages, and (5) Double Question. While topics vary, almost every prompt fits one of these patterns. Knowing them helps you organize ideas quickly, select relevant examples, and avoid missing any required task element—such as giving your opinion when asked or addressing both questions in a double-question prompt.
Examiners assess four equal-weight criteria: Task Response (answering all parts with clear ideas and support), Coherence and Cohesion (logical flow, paragraphing, and linking), Lexical Resource (range and precision of vocabulary), and Grammatical Range and Accuracy (varied structures with minimal errors). To boost your band, ensure your thesis matches the question, develop each paragraph with explanations and examples, use topic-appropriate vocabulary, and demonstrate control of complex sentences without sacrificing clarity.
A flexible blueprint is: Introduction (paraphrase the question + clear thesis), Body Paragraph 1 (main idea + explanation + specific example), Body Paragraph 2 (second main idea + explanation + example), and Conclusion (concise summary reaffirming your stance). For discussion questions, add a short paragraph to present both views before your opinion, or integrate both sides within the two main paragraphs and state your stance clearly in the conclusion.
Your thesis should directly answer the question and preview your line of reasoning. Avoid vague claims like “There are pros and cons.” Instead, be specific: “Although remote work can reduce social contact, I believe its flexibility and productivity benefits make it a positive development.” This gives the reader a roadmap, supports coherence, and prevents drifting off-topic. Keep it one or two sentences and place it at the end of the introduction.
Spend 3–5 minutes planning: identify your position, choose two main ideas, and note one concrete example for each. Decide your topic sentences and a brief conclusion angle. This micro-outline keeps you focused, speeds up writing, and reduces repetition. Reserve 4–5 minutes at the end to proofread for article usage, verb tense consistency, subject–verb agreement, punctuation, and transitions that improve cohesion.
Paraphrase the question using synonyms and different structures to show lexical flexibility, then state a clear thesis that answers the exact task. Keep introductions concise—two to four sentences are usually sufficient. Avoid memorized templates or generic background information that does not address the prompt; examiners value directness, relevance, and precision more than length or rhetorical flourishes.
Use a varied but natural set of linkers: “however,” “therefore,” “consequently,” “in contrast,” “in addition,” and “for instance.” Start each paragraph with a topic sentence and build logically from claim to explanation to example. Replace repetitive connectors (“and,” “but,” “so”) with more precise transitions, but avoid overuse. Cohesion also comes from pronoun referencing, parallel structure, and consistent paragraph focus.
Use precise, topic-appropriate terms and strong collocations (e.g., “carbon emissions,” “policy intervention,” “digital divide,” “public health infrastructure”). Replace informal words with academic equivalents (“kids” → “children,” “a lot of” → “a significant number of”). Demonstrate range with synonyms, yet keep meaning accurate. Avoid misusing rare words; clarity and correctness outweigh obscurity. Paraphrase the prompt intelligently rather than repeating its exact phrases.
Adopt the “C-E-E” mini-structure inside paragraphs: Claim (topic sentence stating the main idea), Explain (why this is true or important), and Example (a short, specific illustration, real or hypothetical). This ensures depth without rambling. Two well-developed main ideas usually outperform four shallow points. If you add a counterargument, rebut it efficiently to reinforce your position without bloating the essay.
Frequent issues include not answering all parts of the question (especially in double-question tasks), weak or missing thesis statements, listing ideas without development, and giving examples that do not support the claim. Another pitfall is switching positions mid-essay or offering contradictory points. Always align explanations and examples with your thesis and ensure each paragraph clearly advances your overall argument.
Present each view fairly with reasons and a brief example, then state your opinion clearly. Maintain balance by giving similar space to both sides before you evaluate. Use neutral language for the opposing view and stronger, assertive language for your stance. If your opinion appears early, keep it consistent throughout. Conclude by synthesizing the debate and reaffirming why your position best addresses the issue.
First, identify a specific cause and explain its impact. Then propose a realistic solution that logically addresses that cause. For instance: “Urban sprawl increases car dependency, intensifying congestion. By expanding rapid transit and introducing congestion pricing, cities can shift commuters to public transport and reduce peak-hour traffic.” Clear linkage between problem and remedy convinces the examiner you can analyze and design workable responses.
Show range with complex and compound sentences, conditionals, relative clauses, and passive forms where appropriate. However, prioritize accuracy over complexity. Persistent errors in articles, prepositions, or verb forms lower your score quickly. After drafting, scan for common issues: singular/plural agreement, tense consistency, missing articles (“a,” “an,” “the”), comma splices, and punctuation around linkers like “however” and “therefore.”
Task 2 is formal, but occasional personal examples are acceptable if they are relevant and concise. Many candidates prefer generalized or real-world examples (studies, policies, trends) to maintain an academic tone. If you use “I,” keep it analytical rather than anecdotal. The priority is evidence that clearly supports your argument, not storytelling. Avoid emotional language and maintain a measured, logical voice throughout.
Organize one paragraph for advantages and one for disadvantages, each with two well-explained points and brief examples. If the prompt asks for your opinion, weigh the two sides in the conclusion and state which is stronger. Use comparative language—“while,” “whereas,” “on the other hand”—to highlight contrasts. Ensure balance; an essay with three benefits and a token drawback often feels biased and underdeveloped.
Write a thesis that signals you will answer both questions and dedicate a clearly labeled paragraph to each. Start paragraphs with topic sentences like “The main reason is …” and “Overall, this trend is positive/negative because …”. Avoid merging both answers into one paragraph, which risks superficial coverage. Finish by summarizing both answers and, if required, giving a concise overall evaluation.
Keep the conclusion short and decisive. Restate your thesis in new words and synthesize the two key ideas you developed. Do not add new arguments or examples. A precise, confident closing line—“Therefore, targeted investment and regulation are essential to achieve lasting improvements”—signals clear control of your position and helps coherence.
A proven allocation is: 5 minutes planning, 30 minutes writing, and 5 minutes proofreading. Planning saves time later by preventing rewrites. During writing, monitor paragraph balance to avoid a bloated first body paragraph and rushed second one. In the final review, fix obvious grammar slips, refine topic sentences, and adjust linkers for smoother flow. Even two or three quick corrections can lift your band.
Practice under timed conditions with real prompts. After each essay, evaluate it against the four official criteria and rewrite weak paragraphs. Build a personal bank of topic vocabulary and collocations for common themes (education, environment, technology, health, work). Read a few high-quality model answers to study structure and transitions, but avoid memorized templates. Consistency—several focused essays per week—matters more than occasional marathon sessions.