 
                                        
                    
                    
                    
Contents
Preparing for the IELTS Writing test is not only about improving grammar, vocabulary, and essay structure. One of the most important aspects that determines your score is time management. The test gives you exactly 60 minutes to complete two tasks: Task 1 (150 words minimum) and Task 2 (250 words minimum). Many candidates struggle with finishing on time, which leads to incomplete answers, poor organization, and lower band scores. In this guide, we’ll break down how to manage those 60 minutes effectively and maximize your chances of success.
The IELTS Writing test is designed to evaluate not only your language proficiency but also your ability to produce logical, well-structured writing under time pressure. Even if your English is strong, you may lose marks if:
You do not complete both tasks.
You write too few words (under the word count).
You run out of time for proofreading and correcting errors.
You spend too long planning and not enough writing.
Time management ensures that you allocate enough minutes for each stage: planning, writing, and reviewing.
Task 1:
Academic: Describe, summarize, or explain a graph, chart, table, process, or diagram.
General Training: Write a letter (formal, semi-formal, or informal).
Word requirement: at least 150 words.
Recommended time: 20 minutes.
Task 2:
Write an essay in response to a point of view, argument, or problem.
Word requirement: at least 250 words.
Recommended time: 40 minutes.
The weighting is important: Task 2 is worth twice as many points as Task 1. That’s why test experts recommend spending about one-third of your time on Task 1 and two-thirds on Task 2.
Here’s a practical way to divide your 60 minutes:
Analyze the question (2 minutes) – Identify the type of chart, letter purpose, or required description. Highlight keywords.
Plan your structure (3 minutes) – Decide your overview, main points, and how to group data.
Write (12 minutes) – Focus on clarity, logical flow, and correct grammar.
Review (3 minutes) – Check word count, spelling, verb tenses, and cohesion.
Analyze the question (3 minutes) – Identify the essay type (opinion, discussion, problem-solution, advantages-disadvantages). Highlight keywords.
Brainstorm and plan (7 minutes) – Organize your arguments, examples, and paragraph structure. A good plan saves time while writing.
Write (25 minutes) – Develop your introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. Stay within 250–320 words.
Review (5 minutes) – Correct grammar errors, check for repetition, and ensure your conclusion matches your thesis.
Some candidates prefer to follow the test order, starting with Task 1. However, many teachers recommend starting with Task 2, because:
It carries more marks (66% of your Writing band score).
It requires deeper thinking and organization.
If you run out of time, at least you will have completed the more important task.
That said, if you are confident in your speed and accuracy, you may stick to the test order. Choose the method that best suits your strengths.
Spending too much time planning
Some candidates plan for 15 minutes, leaving little time to write. While planning is crucial, keep it short and focused.
Writing too much in Task 1
Writing 250–300 words in Task 1 wastes time and energy. Stick to 160–180 words.
Ignoring proofreading
Skipping the review stage often results in easy-to-fix mistakes. Even two or three minutes of checking can raise your score.
Not practicing under timed conditions
Many candidates prepare essays at home without timing themselves. On test day, they panic when the clock is ticking.
Set a 60-minute timer at home and simulate real exam conditions. This helps you build speed and get used to the pressure.
While you cannot memorize full essays, having basic structures ready for introductions and conclusions can save time.
Avoid long, confusing sentences. Use clear topic sentences and direct examples. This saves time and improves coherence.
Writing 400 words full of repetition and mistakes is less effective than writing 270 words with precision and accuracy.
If you cannot remember a complex word, use a simpler synonym. Time lost searching your memory can ruin your flow.
Let’s imagine you are taking the test:
0:00 – Start
Decide to do Task 2 first.
0:00–0:03 (3 min) – Read Task 2 carefully and underline keywords.
0:03–0:10 (7 min) – Plan essay outline with main arguments.
0:10–0:35 (25 min) – Write full essay.
0:35–0:40 (5 min) – Review and correct essay.
0:40–0:42 (2 min) – Read Task 1 question carefully.
0:42–0:45 (3 min) – Plan your description/letter.
0:45–0:57 (12 min) – Write Task 1.
0:57–1:00 (3 min) – Review Task 1.
This schedule ensures you finish both tasks with time for checking.
Time management is not only technical—it’s also psychological. Stress can make you write too slowly or forget your plan. Here are some tips:
Practice breathing techniques – When anxious, take a deep breath to reset focus.
Don’t waste time erasing – If you make a mistake, cross it out neatly and continue.
Trust your preparation – If you’ve practiced enough, you’ll naturally follow your rhythm.
Think of the big picture – Even small improvements in speed can lead to a higher band score.
Effective time management in the IELTS Writing test is a skill you can develop through practice and discipline. By dividing your 60 minutes strategically—20 for Task 1, 40 for Task 2—you give yourself the best chance to complete both tasks with confidence. Always remember that Task 2 is more important, so prioritize it, but do not neglect Task 1. With careful planning, consistent practice under timed conditions, and strong focus during the test, you can maximize your score and move closer to your target band.
The widely recommended split is 20 minutes for Task 1 and 40 minutes for Task 2 because Task 2 contributes twice as many marks as Task 1. Within those blocks, break time down into three phases: analyse (2–3 minutes), plan (3–7 minutes), write (12–25 minutes), and review (3–5 minutes). A typical schedule is: Task 2 first (3 minutes analyse, 7 minutes plan, 25 minutes write, 5 minutes review) and Task 1 afterward (2 minutes analyse, 3 minutes plan, 12 minutes write, 3 minutes review). This structure ensures you complete both tasks, hit minimum word counts, and still have time to correct high-impact errors.
Doing Task 2 first is a smart time strategy because it carries more weight and often requires deeper thinking. Tackling it while you are fresh reduces the risk of running out of time for the higher-value task. However, if you are already excellent at finishing on time and prefer the original order, that is fine—what matters is consistency. If your mock tests show you sometimes miss Task 2 or rush the conclusion, switch to Task 2 first.
Aim for efficiency: about 160–180 words for Task 1 and 260–300 words for Task 2. Writing far beyond these ranges usually adds little value and steals precious review time. Focus on clarity, paragraphing, and task response, not raw length. If you reach the minimum word count with strong, well-supported ideas, move on to proofreading rather than adding repetitive sentences.
Use a 1–2 minute micro-plan for Task 1 and a 5–7 minute plan for Task 2. For Task 1 (Academic), jot an overview and 2–3 grouped comparisons; for General Training letters, note the purpose, tone, and bullet points covering all prompts. For Task 2, write a mini-outline: thesis (one line), topic sentence ideas for each body paragraph, and one concrete example per paragraph. Limit yourself to 6–8 bullet points total. The plan should be skeletal—enough to guide fluent writing, not a draft.
Example if you start with Task 2:
Train your eye by practicing with standard line and word densities. On paper, learn roughly how many words you produce per line in your usual handwriting; on computer-delivered tests, use the on-screen word counter. In practice sessions, stop writing at your target length so your pacing becomes automatic on test day. Avoid counting every word—estimate by lines or rely on the counter if available.
Use a tight 60–90 second checklist per task:
Use compact templates that you adapt, not memorize verbatim. For Task 2, keep the introduction to 2–3 sentences (context + thesis). For the conclusion, write 1–2 crisp sentences that directly restate your position and main reason(s). Do not include new ideas in the conclusion. For Task 1, open with a one-sentence paraphrase of the task and an overview, then dive into grouped details—no lengthy background.
Top culprits include: overlong planning, rewriting entire sentences for style instead of clarity, hunting for “perfect” vocabulary, excessive data listing in Task 1, and adding new arguments at the end of Task 2. Replace them with habits that compound speed: strict planning limits, concise topic sentences, one example per body paragraph, grouped data comparisons for Task 1, and a fixed review checklist.
Follow a predictable three-part structure: (1) paraphrase + overall trend/overview; (2) paragraph focusing on the first logical group of data; (3) paragraph focusing on the second group or key contrasts. Avoid describing every data point. Instead, highlight extremes, significant changes, and meaningful comparisons. Practise grouping (e.g., “countries above 70%,” “years of rapid growth”) so your brain recognizes patterns quickly and you write fewer, more informative sentences.
Decide tone in seconds (formal, semi-formal, informal) based on the scenario. Plan 3–4 bullet points that map to the prompts, each becoming a short paragraph. Use a brief opening line that states purpose, then address each bullet with 2–3 sentences, and close politely. Do not over-elaborate stories; the goal is completeness, appropriate tone, and clear organization within about 12–14 minutes of writing.
If time is slipping, prioritize structure and completion. For Task 2, write a short but clear conclusion that re-states your position, and ensure each body paragraph has a topic sentence. For Task 1, add a one-sentence overview if missing and at least one grouped comparison. Even 60–90 seconds of targeted fixes can raise scores in Task Response and Coherence & Cohesion. Do not start a new idea; strengthen what you already have.
Use progressive overload: start with untimed drafting to refine structure, then move to partial timing (e.g., 10 minutes plan + 20 minutes write), and finally full 60-minute simulations. Keep a log that records plan time, write time, review time, and common bottlenecks. Aim for three full timed tests per week in the final two weeks before your exam. Review each script with a checklist and rewrite only the weakest paragraph under the same time cap.
Three standouts: (1) writing decisive topic sentences that map the paragraph, (2) using specific but compact examples (statistics, brief scenarios, or cause–effect chains), and (3) paraphrasing efficiently without distorting meaning. Also train “linking on the go”: use natural connectors (for example, however, as a result, in contrast) sparingly and purposefully, so you don’t pause to think of transitions mid-sentence.
Choose controlled complexity. Use a mix of simple and complex sentences that you can execute accurately. A clean argument with varied but accurate grammar outweighs an error-filled attempt at sophistication. When in doubt, shorten the sentence, keep subject–verb distance tight, and position clauses clearly. This approach reduces editing time and raises your accuracy bands.
Before writing, take one slow breath and underline task keywords to anchor your focus. Set mental alarms (e.g., “If I’m still drafting Body 1 at 00:20, move on”). Keep your review checklist visible in your mind. If anxiety spikes, pause for a 5-second inhale and 5-second exhale; then resume. Discipline plus micro-resets keeps your pace stable and prevents spirals of over-editing.
Run this 30–60 second sweep: confirm you answered all parts of the question; scan topic sentences; ensure the conclusion/overview exists and aligns; fix one or two repeated words with natural synonyms; correct any obvious grammar slips (agreement, articles, tense). Do not attempt major rewrites—small, precise fixes produce the best time-to-score return.
Track results from five timed mock tests using both orders (Task 2 first vs. test order). Compare completion rates, coherence of conclusions, and number of errors caught in review. Choose the method that consistently yields complete scripts, clear paragraphing, and a calm final minute. Personal data beats general advice—once you find your split, commit to it in every practice to build muscle memory.